judicialwatch.org

https://judicialwatch.org· First analyzed 23 Apr 2026· Updated 23 Apr 2026

Export

judicialwatch.org

Mobile

Sponsored

Hosting Provider

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

aws.amazon.com

IP Address

52.73.186.12

Site Location

🇺🇸 United Statesvia ip

Server Location

🇺🇸 Ashburn, United States

ASN

AS14618

Organization

AWS EC2 (us-east-1)

Server

Cloudflare

CDN

Cloudflare

WAF

Cloudflare

Nameservers

ns2.p201.dns.oraclecloud.net.ns1.p201.dns.oraclecloud.net.ns3.p201.dns.oraclecloud.net.ns4.p201.dns.oraclecloud.net.

Performance

100

Core Web Vitals

Weight

First Contentful Paint

550 ms10%

Speed Index

715 ms10%

Largest Contentful Paint

—25%

Total Blocking Time

0.0 ms30%

Cumulative Layout Shift

0.00025%

2.4 MB

180 requests

Image Optimization

Lazy LoadAVIFResponsive

0–49

50–89

90–100

Architecture Stack

Monolithic

⚙️ SSR

WordPressv6.6.5

cms

Judicial Watchv1.0Custom

by Engage, LLC

Technology Stack

26 Technologies Detected

Plugins

Interactive Geo Maps Premium Presto Player Widget Countdown

Analytics

Advertising

Google Ads Twitter Ads

Libraries

UI Components

CSS Frameworks

Icon Libraries

Fonts

Tag Managers

Social

CDN

Customer Support

SEO Analysis

B73/100

Meta Tags8/15

Content8/12

Headings6/8

Technical23/25

E-E-A-T0/7

Images3/7

Links5/5

URL5/5

Social4/5

Freshness4/4

Mobile4/4

Indexability3/3

judicialwatch.orgjudicialwatch.org

Home | Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch, a conservative foundation, fights for accountability and integrity in law, politics and government. Because no one is above the law!Happy Tha...

Description truncated.

Title Length21 chars

Recommended: 50-60 chars (~127px / 580px)

Description Length167 chars

Recommended: 120-160 chars

Issues (1)

• Most images missing alt text (87/117) — critical for accessibility and SEO

9 issues found

Upgrade to view details

Crawlability

Sitemap

Type: index

95 URLs

95 sub-sitemaps

robots.txt

4 rules

Sitemap reference found

Allows all crawlers

Local SEO

Local Search Readiness

13/100

Poor

4 12 1

This site doesn't appear to be a local business. Local SEO signals are optional for non-local websites.

Sponsored

AI & LLM Readiness

D42/100

Bot Access

20/25

Machine Read.

2/25

Schema Data

4/25

Citation

16/25

AI Bot Access

14/14 accessible

AI Search

OAI-SearchBot

PerplexityBot

Claude-SearchBot

Gemini-Deep-Research

DuckAssistBot

Training

GPTBot

ClaudeBot

Google-Extended

Meta-ExternalAgent

Bytespiderinfo

Amazonbot

Applebot-Extended

CCBotinfo

Fetch

ChatGPT-User

Machine Readability

llms.txt

llms-full.txt

Semantic HTML

Heading Hierarchy

nav

Text ratio:3%

Words:3,126

Token eff.:Poor Structure

Sections/1K:1.6

Depth:1/5

Structured Data

4 JSON-LD

WebSiteBreadcrumbListSearchAction

Citation Readiness

Opening Summary1315w

Descriptive Headingsavg 4.1w

Canonical URL

Open Graph3/3

Twitter Card1/3

Language Tag

Publish Date

Author Info

Lists

Tables

TL;DR / Summary

About Page Link

Recommendations (11)

AI readiness recommendation preview...

Upgrade to view recommendations

Sponsored

Accessibility

WCAG 2.1 Compliance

Evaluates how accessible your website is for users with disabilities, based on WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Checks images, forms, keyboard navigation, ARIA roles, and color contrast.

66/100

Passed

Critical

Warnings

Images & Alt Text

15/20

Checks if images have descriptive alt text for screen readers and visually impaired users.

Semantic Structure

11/20

Evaluates proper use of HTML5 semantic elements (header, nav, main, footer) and heading hierarchy.

Forms & Inputs

5/15

Verifies form fields have labels, error messages are clear, and inputs are properly associated.

Color & Contrast

15/15

Tests text-to-background color contrast ratios against WCAG AA/AAA minimum requirements.

Keyboard & Focus

15/15

Ensures all interactive elements are reachable and operable via keyboard (tab, enter, escape).

ARIA & Roles

5/15

Checks correct use of WAI-ARIA attributes (roles, states, properties) for assistive technologies.

4 recommendations

•Accessibility recommendation preview...

Upgrade to view recommendations

Carbon Footprint

SWDM v4 · Eco-Score

Carbon emissions estimated using the Sustainable Web Design Model v4 (SWDM v4). Factors in data center, network, and device energy across new and returning visitors. Grade thresholds based on HTTP Archive percentiles.

57/100

248 mg

CO₂e / view

2.4 MB

Page Weight

30%

Cleaner Than

New Visitor

284 mg

Returning (cached)

142 mg

Annual (10K/mo)

29.8 kg

Emission Segments

Data Center

12 mg

Network

73 mg

Device

163 mg

Resource Breakdown

JavaScript

699.5 KB

Images

326.3 KB

CSS

1.4 MB

Fonts

1.7 KB

HTML

47.4 KB

Other

300 B

Green Hosting Verified

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Provider Match

5 recommendations

•Carbon footprint recommendation preview...

Upgrade to view recommendations

Security Score

26%Critical

Interactive

HTTPS

WAF

170d

Certificate Details

Type

Organization Validated (OV)

Certificate Authority

Sectigo Limited

Key Algorithm

RSA (2048 bit)

Signature

SHA-256 with RSA

TLS Version

TLSv1.3

HTTP Protocol

HTTP/2+H3

Valid From

26.03.2026

Valid Until

10.10.2026

OCSP Stapling

Enabled

Subject Alternative Names (2)

*.judicialwatch.orgjudicialwatch.org

SHA-256 Fingerprint

0D:BC:A5:B2:A7:F0:79:C0:08:C0:67:05:C3:BD:FC:C4:1B:2C:A8:BC...

Top Recommendations

Security recommendation preview

Upgrade to view recommendations

Upgrade to view header details

HTTP Headers

Developer Console

alt-svc

h3=":443"; ma=86400

cache-control

🟡 600s(max-age=600, must-revalidate)

cf-cache-status

DYNAMIC

cf-ray🇩🇪 Frankfurt

9f0b2258dab4b32c-FRA

content-encoding

⚡ Brotli(br)

content-type

text/html; charset=UTF-8

Good Warning Issue

Email Infrastructure

Microsoft 365

Score

100

SPF

DKIM

DMARC

DMARC Policy

Reject (Strictest)

MX Records (1)

judicialwatch-org.mail.protection.outlook.com

Domain Information

judicialwatch.org

Domain Age

28y 9m

Created

16.07.1997

Expires

15.07.2030

Last Updated

14.07.2025

Registrar

GoDaddy.com, LLC

DNSSEC

Not Enabled

Privacy & Compliance

Usercentrics

Cookie Consent Banner

Usercentrics

GDPR Indicators

Cookie consent banner detected

CMP: Usercentrics

Mobile Compatibility

Viewport & Responsive Test

Tests how well your website works on mobile devices. Checks viewport configuration, responsive layout, touch targets, font readability, and simulates rendering across different screen sizes.

66/100

Mobile Friendly6 breakpoints

Viewport Meta

The viewport meta tag tells mobile browsers how to scale the page. Without it, mobile devices render at desktop width.

Responsive Design

Uses CSS media queries or flexible layouts to adapt content to different screen sizes automatically.

Touch Icons

Apple touch icons and favicons displayed when users add the site to their home screen on mobile devices.

Readable Font Size

Base font size should be at least 16px on mobile to ensure text is readable without zooming.

Relative Units

Using em, rem, %, or vw instead of fixed px values allows content to scale properly across screen sizes.

No H-Scroll Risk

No elements wider than the viewport that would cause horizontal scrolling on mobile devices.

Tap Targets OK

Interactive elements (buttons, links) are at least 48x48px with enough spacing to prevent accidental taps.

No Fixed Widths

No elements with fixed pixel widths that could overflow on smaller screens and break the layout.

Viewport

width=device-width,initial-scale=1,minimum-scale=1,maximum-scale=1,user-scalable=no,viewport-fit=cover

3 recommendations

•Mobile compatibility recommendation preview...

Upgrade to view recommendations

Typography & Readability

Uniform Condensed Bold + DM Sans

WCAG Partial

54/100

Readability

/30

10/30

12px · LH 1.10

Hierarchy

/20

18/20

4.33x ratio

WCAG

/25

14/25

3.65:1 min contrast

Performance

/25

12/25

3 fonts · 7 req

Heading Font

Uniform Condensed Bold

Sans52px

Body Font

DM Sans

Sans12px

Contrast Ratio

3.65:1

14 issues

Reading Comfort

~42 CPL

Narrow lines

52px

24px

22px

12px

❌ Critical: 12px body text is too small. Minimum 14px, recommend 16px+.

⚠️ Tight line spacing (1.10). Increase to 1.4–1.6 for better readability.

⚠️ Partial contrast: 14 elements below WCAG AA threshold (min 3.6:1).

⚠️ Minor heading issue: 0 level skip(s) detected. Maintain sequential order for screen readers.

✅ Strong hierarchy: Headlines are 4.3x larger than body text.

✅ Modern fluid typography: clamp() with rem units ensures zoom accessibility (WCAG 1.4.4).

GGoogle Fonts Buy on MyFontsFluid Type (rem)

Color Palette

10 unique colors

Light

#ffffff

Background· 38.900000000000006%

#163d58

Primary· 11.2%

#0f456f

Accent· 8.5%

#8fa8ba

Secondary· 6.9%

#41679d

Secondary· 5.6%

#061b38

Accent· 4.9%

#2f394d

Secondary· 2.7%

Business & Marketing Stack

7 Tools Detected

Enterprise

Marketing Automation

MailchimpSMB

Email marketing and automation platforms

Behavior Analytics

Google Tag ManagerFree

Google AnalyticsFree

HotjarMid-Market

User behavior and product analytics

Advertising

Facebook PixelMid-Market

Twitter/X AdsMid-Market

Ad platforms and retargeting pixels

Social Media

AddThisFree

Social widgets and sharing tools

Sponsored

Scripts & Styles

30 Resources

Scripts

Styles

Async

Defer

Top Script Sources

judicialwatch.org(6)apis.google.com(3)web.cmp.usercentrics.eu(3)connect.facebook.net(2)google-analytics.com(2)

Website Identity

Judicial Watch - Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch, a conservative foundation, fights for accountability and integrity in law, politics and government. Because no one is above the law!Happy Thanksgiving!

www.judicialwatch.org/

28 years old

Location detected: 🇺🇸 United Statesvia ip

GoDaddy.com, LLC📧 Microsoft 365en-US

Social Profiles

Facebook X (Twitter)Instagram YouTube Telegram

Sponsored

Last analyzed: 23 Apr 2026 at 07:25

Historical Analysis & Change Tracking