StackOptic
Back to Search
hi.no favicon

hi.no

https://hi.no· First analyzed 07 May 2026· Updated 07 May 2026
Export
hi.no
Desktop screenshot of hi.no
Mobile screenshot of hi.no
Mobile

Sponsored

Hosting Provider

Microsoft Azure
azure.microsoft.com

IP Address

4.235.115.7

Site Location

🇳🇴 Norwayvia tld

Server Location

🇳🇴 Lorenskog, Norway

ASN

AS8075

Organization

Microsoft Azure Cloud (norwaye)

Server

Nginx

CDN

CDN

Nameservers

ns.imr.no.mx3.imr.no.

Performance

73

Core Web Vitals

Weight

First Contentful Paint
6.2 s10%
Speed Index
8.1 s10%
Largest Contentful Paint
—25%
Total Blocking Time
0.0 ms30%
Cumulative Layout Shift
0.00025%
1.4 MB
41 requests
0–49
50–89
90–100

Architecture Stack

Monolithic
⚙️ SSR
Infrastructure
Hosting
Microsoft Azure
CDN
CDN

Technology Stack

9 Technologies Detected

CSS Frameworks

3
Tailwind CSS
Foundation
Bootstrap

Analytics

2
Google Analytics
Google Analytics 4

Libraries

1
jQueryv3.2.1

Icon Libraries

1
Font Awesome

Fonts

1
Google Fonts

Web Servers

1
Nginxv1.24.0

SEO Analysis

B72/100
21
7
0
Meta Tags15/15
Content12/12
Headings8/8
Technical14/25
E-E-A-T0/7
Images2/7
Links5/5
URL5/5
Social5/5
Freshness2/4
Mobile1/4
Indexability3/3
H
hi.nohi.no

Havforskningsinstituttet | Havforskningsinstituttet

Havforskningsinstituttet (HI) er det største marine forskningsinstituttet i Europa. Hovedaktivitetene våre er forskning, rådgivning og overvåkning.

Title Length51 chars

Recommended: 50-60 chars (~300px / 580px)

Description Length147 chars

Recommended: 120-160 chars

Issues (0)

    7 issues found

    Upgrade to view details

    Crawlability

    Sitemap
    robots.txt

    14 rules

    Local SEO

    Local Search Readiness

    5/100
    Poor
    1 14 2

    This site doesn't appear to be a local business. Local SEO signals are optional for non-local websites.

    Sponsored

    AI & LLM Readiness

    D45/100
    Bot Access
    20/25
    Machine Read.
    13/25
    Schema Data
    0/25
    Citation
    12/25

    AI Bot Access

    14/14 accessible
    AI Search
    OAI-SearchBot
    PerplexityBot
    Claude-SearchBot
    Gemini-Deep-Research
    DuckAssistBot
    Training
    GPTBot
    ClaudeBot
    Google-Extended
    Meta-ExternalAgent
    Bytespiderinfo
    Amazonbot
    Applebot-Extended
    CCBotinfo
    Fetch
    ChatGPT-User

    Machine Readability

    llms.txt
    llms-full.txt
    Semantic HTML
    Heading Hierarchy
    navheader/footer
    Text ratio:6%
    Words:773
    Token eff.:Optimal
    Sections/1K:36.2
    Depth:2/5

    Structured Data

    No Schema

    Citation Readiness

    Opening Summary221w
    Descriptive Headingsavg 3.8w
    Canonical URL
    Open Graph3/3
    Twitter Card3/3
    Language Tag
    Publish Date
    Author Info
    Lists
    Tables
    TL;DR / Summary
    About Page Link
    Recommendations (8)
    AI readiness recommendation preview...
    Upgrade to view recommendations

    Sponsored

    Accessibility

    WCAG 2.1 Compliance

    Evaluates how accessible your website is for users with disabilities, based on WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Checks images, forms, keyboard navigation, ARIA roles, and color contrast.
    A
    85/100
    13
    Passed
    2
    Critical
    0
    Warnings
    Images & Alt Text
    20/20
    Checks if images have descriptive alt text for screen readers and visually impaired users.
    Semantic Structure
    20/20
    Evaluates proper use of HTML5 semantic elements (header, nav, main, footer) and heading hierarchy.
    Forms & Inputs
    15/15
    Verifies form fields have labels, error messages are clear, and inputs are properly associated.
    Color & Contrast
    15/15
    Tests text-to-background color contrast ratios against WCAG AA/AAA minimum requirements.
    Keyboard & Focus
    7/15
    Ensures all interactive elements are reachable and operable via keyboard (tab, enter, escape).
    ARIA & Roles
    8/15
    Checks correct use of WAI-ARIA attributes (roles, states, properties) for assistive technologies.
    1 recommendation
    • •Accessibility recommendation preview...
    Upgrade to view recommendations

    Carbon Footprint

    SWDM v4 · Eco-Score

    Carbon emissions estimated using the Sustainable Web Design Model v4 (SWDM v4). Factors in data center, network, and device energy across new and returning visitors. Grade thresholds based on HTTP Archive percentiles.
    50/100
    C
    148 mg
    CO₂e / view
    1.4 MB
    Page Weight
    60%
    Cleaner Than
    New Visitor
    169 mg
    vs
    Returning (cached)
    84 mg
    Annual (10K/mo)
    17.7 kg
    Emission Segments
    Data Center
    7 mg
    Network
    43 mg
    Device
    97 mg
    Resource Breakdown
    JavaScript
    69.5 KB
    Images
    1.3 MB
    CSS
    50.8 KB
    Fonts
    3.4 KB
    HTML
    17.6 KB
    Green Hosting Verified
    Microsoft Azure
    Provider Match
    5 recommendations
    • •Carbon footprint recommendation preview...
    Upgrade to view recommendations
    F

    Security Score

    21%Critical
    Interactive

    HTTPS

    No WAF

    36d

    Certificate Details

    Type

    Domain Validated (DV)

    Certificate Authority

    Let's Encrypt

    Key Algorithm

    ECDSA (secp256r1) (256 bit)

    Signature

    ECDSA with SHA-384

    TLS Version

    TLSv1.3

    HTTP Protocol

    HTTP/1.1

    Valid From

    15.03.2026

    Valid Until

    13.06.2026

    Subject Alternative Names (2)

    hi.nowww.hi.no

    SHA-256 Fingerprint

    3A:20:5F:33:75:53:34:BD:3D:31:52:9A:81:73:DA:C4:DD:9C:22:53...

    Top Recommendations

    Security recommendation preview

    Upgrade to view recommendations
    Upgrade to view header details

    HTTP Headers

    Developer Console

    access-control-allow-credentials
    True
    access-control-allow-headers
    x-requested-with,content-type
    access-control-allow-methods
    GET, OPTIONS
    access-control-allow-origin
    *
    charset
    utf-8
    connection
    keep-alive
    Good Warning Issue

    Email Infrastructure

    Microsoft 365

    Score

    98

    SPF
    DKIM
    DMARC

    DMARC Policy

    Quarantine (Moderate)

    MX Records (1)

    hi-no.mail.protection.outlook.com

    Domain Information

    hi.no

    Domain Age
    9y 2m

    Created

    06.03.2017

    Last Updated

    06.02.2026

    Registrar

    Domeneshop AS

    DNSSEC
    Not Enabled

    Privacy & Compliance

    CookieYes

    Cookie Consent Banner
    CookieYes
    Privacy Policy
    Terms of Service

    GDPR Indicators

    Cookie consent banner detected
    CMP: CookieYes

    Mobile Compatibility

    Viewport & Responsive Test

    Tests how well your website works on mobile devices. Checks viewport configuration, responsive layout, touch targets, font readability, and simulates rendering across different screen sizes.
    C
    62/100
    Mobile Friendly1 breakpoint
    Viewport Meta
    The viewport meta tag tells mobile browsers how to scale the page. Without it, mobile devices render at desktop width.
    Responsive Design
    Uses CSS media queries or flexible layouts to adapt content to different screen sizes automatically.
    Touch Icons
    Apple touch icons and favicons displayed when users add the site to their home screen on mobile devices.
    Readable Font Size
    Base font size should be at least 16px on mobile to ensure text is readable without zooming.
    Relative Units
    Using em, rem, %, or vw instead of fixed px values allows content to scale properly across screen sizes.
    No H-Scroll Risk
    No elements wider than the viewport that would cause horizontal scrolling on mobile devices.
    Tap Targets OK
    Interactive elements (buttons, links) are at least 48x48px with enough spacing to prevent accidental taps.
    No Fixed Widths
    No elements with fixed pixel widths that could overflow on smaller screens and break the layout.
    Viewport
    width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, user-scalable=yes
    2 recommendations
    • •Mobile compatibility recommendation preview...
    Upgrade to view recommendations

    Typography & Readability

    symbol

    WCAG AA
    73/100
    Readability
    /30
    25/30

    16px · LH 1.50

    Hierarchy
    /20
    16/20

    2x ratio · ✓ H1→H6

    WCAG
    /25
    21/25

    6:1 min contrast

    Performance
    /25
    11/25

    3 fonts · 2 req

    Heading Font

    symbol

    Sans32px

    Body Font

    symbol

    Sans16px

    Contrast Ratio

    6:1

    WCAG AA (≥4.5:1)

    Reading Comfort

    ~38 CPL

    Narrow lines
    32px
    h1
    32px
    h2
    22px
    h3
    21px
    h4
    16px
    p

    ✅ Excellent readability: 16px body text is ideal for all devices.

    ✅ Optimal line spacing: 1.50 ratio (ideal range 1.4–1.6).

    ⚠️ Hard to read: Flesch score 30/100. Simplify sentences for wider reach.

    ✅ WCAG AA contrast: All text meets 4.5:1 ratio (min 6.0:1).

    ✅ Perfect heading hierarchy: Sequential h1→h2→h3 with single H1 — ideal for SEO & accessibility.

    ✅ Strong hierarchy: Headlines are 2.0x larger than body text.

    GGoogle FontsBuy on MyFontsFlesch 30

    Color Palette

    11 unique colors
    3.13:1 AA Large Light
    #fefefe
    Background· 38.4%
    #949091
    Other· 5.8%
    #5f697e
    Primary· 8.8%
    #6587bb
    Secondary· 8.5%
    #a5b9ce
    Secondary· 7.2%
    #1c2b59
    Accent· 6.4%
    #565b6b
    Secondary· 6.3%
    #3c5274
    Secondary· 4.2%

    Business & Marketing Stack

    2 Tools Detected

    Growing

    Behavior Analytics

    1
    Google AnalyticsFree

    User behavior and product analytics

    Privacy & Cookies

    1
    CookieYesSMB

    Cookie consent and privacy compliance tools

    2

    Categories

    2

    Total Tools

    0

    Enterprise

    0

    Mid-Market

    Assessment: Growing marketing technology adoption

    Sponsored

    Scripts & Styles

    18 Resources

    11
    Scripts
    7
    Styles
    3
    Async
    0
    Defer

    Top Script Sources

    cdn-cookieyes.com(2)cdnjs.cloudflare.com(2)local(2)heatmaps.monsido.com(1)googletagmanager.com(1)

    Website Identity

    hi.no

    9 years old
    Location detected: 🇳🇴 Norwayvia tld
    Domeneshop AS📧 Microsoft 365no

    Sponsored

    Last analyzed: 07 May 2026 at 18:42

    Historical Analysis & Change Tracking