What does StackOptic analyze?

StackOptic runs 18 analysis modules on any public website from a single URL. It detects 7,000+ technologies (CMS, frameworks, analytics, payments, CDN, hosting), evaluates SSL certificates and HTTP security headers with grades from A+ to F, measures Core Web Vitals (LCP, CLS, TBT, FCP), audits SEO meta tags and structured data, checks email security (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), analyzes AI & LLM readiness including bot access and llms.txt validation, extracts color palettes and typography, estimates carbon footprint, and generates permanent shareable reports.

Does it work on sites behind Cloudflare or bot protection?

Yes. StackOptic uses a real browser engine that loads pages exactly like a human visitor — executing JavaScript, rendering CSS, and handling redirects. This allows it to bypass Cloudflare, LiteSpeed, Sucuri, and other bot protection systems where traditional crawlers and HTTP-only tools fail.

What do I get on the free plan?

The free plan includes 5 analyses per day with access to all 18 modules, full scores, technology detection, and security grades. Every report is permanently accessible via a unique shareable URL — no login required to view. No credit card needed. AI-powered insights, re-analysis, PDF/JSON export, and comparison features are available on Pro ($24/mo) and Agency ($99/mo) plans.

What is AI & LLM readiness analysis?

This module evaluates how visible and citable your website is to AI search engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Claude. It audits access permissions for 8 major AI bots, validates llms.txt and llms-full.txt files, scores citation-ready content structure, and analyzes structured data (JSON-LD) for GEO readiness — helping you rank in the next generation of search.

How long does an analysis take?

Most analyses complete in under 10 seconds. StackOptic runs all 18 modules in parallel using a real browser session, so you get technology detection, security audit, performance metrics, SEO analysis, and AI readiness scoring simultaneously.

How accurate are the results?

Detection is based on real browser execution — DOM inspection, JavaScript runtime analysis, HTTP headers, and DNS records. With 7,000+ technology signatures and Lighthouse-calibrated performance scoring, StackOptic achieves high accuracy for mainstream technologies.

What security checks are performed?

The security module evaluates SSL/TLS certificates, 12+ HTTP security headers (HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, Permissions-Policy, Referrer-Policy), HTTPS enforcement, and email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC). Each site receives a letter grade from A+ to F with specific remediation steps.

Do you store the websites I analyze?

StackOptic only stores publicly available information that any visitor to a website would see — HTML content, HTTP headers, DNS records, and screenshots. We do not access private data, log in to websites, or perform any intrusive testing.

Technology Comparison

Unbounce vs Adobe Experience Manager

Side-by-side comparison based on real-world adoption data from 660 detections across analyzed websites.

Market Share Distribution

Unbounce (10%)Adobe Experience Manager (90%)

Total Detections

Unbounce

595

Adobe Experience Manager

HIGHER

Websites Using

Unbounce

595

Adobe Experience Manager

HIGHER

Used Together

websites use both

Unbounce

CMS

Unbounce is a tool to build landing pages.

65 detections

65 sites

Visit Website View Profile

Adobe Experience Manager

CMS

Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) is a content management solution for building websites, mobile apps and forms.

595 detections

595 sites

Visit Website View Profile

Our Analysis

Adobe Experience Manager is significantly more popular than Unbounce in our dataset, appearing on 595 websites compared to 65. Both are in the CMS category, making them direct alternatives.

Sites Using Both (0)

No sites use both technologies together.

Only Unbounce

activestate.com ama.org anwalt.de arthritis.org atlasobscura.com beliefnet.com benetton.com bikeradar.com bluecross.org.uk bostonscientific.com

Only Adobe Experience Manager

53.com 888.com 888casino.com 888poker.com 888slots.de 888sport.com aarp.org abanet.org abb.com abbott.com

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between Unbounce and Adobe Experience Manager?

Unbounce is a tool to build landing pages. Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) is a content management solution for building websites, mobile apps and forms. Both belong to the CMS category, making them direct alternatives.

Which is more popular, Unbounce or Adobe Experience Manager?

Based on our analysis of real websites, Adobe Experience Manager is more widely adopted with 595 detections compared to Unbounce's 65.

Can Unbounce and Adobe Experience Manager be used together?

In our current dataset, no websites use both technologies simultaneously. This suggests they typically serve as alternatives rather than complementary tools.

Check Any Website's Technology Stack

Find out if a website uses Unbounce, Adobe Experience Manager, or any other technology.

Analyze a Website

More Comparisons

Browse All Comparisons →