What does StackOptic analyze?

StackOptic runs 18 analysis modules on any public website from a single URL. It detects 7,000+ technologies (CMS, frameworks, analytics, payments, CDN, hosting), evaluates SSL certificates and HTTP security headers with grades from A+ to F, measures Core Web Vitals (LCP, CLS, TBT, FCP), audits SEO meta tags and structured data, checks email security (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), analyzes AI & LLM readiness including bot access and llms.txt validation, extracts color palettes and typography, estimates carbon footprint, and generates permanent shareable reports.

Does it work on sites behind Cloudflare or bot protection?

Yes. StackOptic uses a real browser engine that loads pages exactly like a human visitor — executing JavaScript, rendering CSS, and handling redirects. This allows it to bypass Cloudflare, LiteSpeed, Sucuri, and other bot protection systems where traditional crawlers and HTTP-only tools fail.

What do I get on the free plan?

The free plan includes 5 analyses per day with access to all 18 modules, full scores, technology detection, and security grades. Every report is permanently accessible via a unique shareable URL — no login required to view. No credit card needed. AI-powered insights, re-analysis, PDF/JSON export, and comparison features are available on Pro ($24/mo) and Agency ($99/mo) plans.

What is AI & LLM readiness analysis?

This module evaluates how visible and citable your website is to AI search engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Claude. It audits access permissions for 8 major AI bots, validates llms.txt and llms-full.txt files, scores citation-ready content structure, and analyzes structured data (JSON-LD) for GEO readiness — helping you rank in the next generation of search.

How long does an analysis take?

Most analyses complete in under 10 seconds. StackOptic runs all 18 modules in parallel using a real browser session, so you get technology detection, security audit, performance metrics, SEO analysis, and AI readiness scoring simultaneously.

How accurate are the results?

Detection is based on real browser execution — DOM inspection, JavaScript runtime analysis, HTTP headers, and DNS records. With 7,000+ technology signatures and Lighthouse-calibrated performance scoring, StackOptic achieves high accuracy for mainstream technologies.

What security checks are performed?

The security module evaluates SSL/TLS certificates, 12+ HTTP security headers (HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, Permissions-Policy, Referrer-Policy), HTTPS enforcement, and email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC). Each site receives a letter grade from A+ to F with specific remediation steps.

Do you store the websites I analyze?

StackOptic only stores publicly available information that any visitor to a website would see — HTML content, HTTP headers, DNS records, and screenshots. We do not access private data, log in to websites, or perform any intrusive testing.

Technology Comparison

Typeform vs Wikimedia EaSAMS Infrastructure

Side-by-side comparison based on real-world adoption data from 30 detections across analyzed websites.

Market Share Distribution

Typeform (37%)Wikimedia EaSAMS Infrastructure (63%)

Total Detections

Typeform

Wikimedia EaSAMS Infrastructure

HIGHER

Websites Using

Typeform

Wikimedia EaSAMS Infrastructure

HIGHER

Used Together

websites use both

Typeform

Other

11 detections

11 sites

Visit Website View Profile

Wikimedia EaSAMS Infrastructure

Other

Wikimedia EaSAMS Infrastructure refers to the underlying systems and services that support the various Wikimedia Foundation projects, including Wikipedia, Wikiversity, and Wikinews. It encompasses the servers, networks, databases, and software that enable these collaborative knowledge platforms to operate and scale globally.

19 detections

19 sites

Visit Website View Profile

Our Analysis

Wikimedia EaSAMS Infrastructure has a slight edge over Typeform, detected on 19 vs 11 websites. Both are in the Other category, making them direct alternatives.

Sites Using Both (0)

No sites use both technologies together.

Only Typeform

aweber.com bangor.ac.uk clickbank.com goodyear.com indeksiletisim.com percona.com plotly.com safewise.com screenpal.com themify.me

Only Wikimedia EaSAMS Infrastructure

commons.wikimedia.org de.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org fr.wikipedia.org ko.wikipedia.org mediawiki.org upload.wikimedia.org vi.wikipedia.org wikibooks.org wikidata.org

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between Typeform and Wikimedia EaSAMS Infrastructure?

Typeform is a SaaS company that allows users to create and share online forms, surveys, and quizzes. It is known for its conversational and user-friendly interface, which aims to improve engagement and completion rates compared to traditional forms. Wikimedia EaSAMS Infrastructure refers to the underlying systems and services that support the various Wikimedia Foundation projects, including Wikipedia, Wikiversity, and Wikinews. It encompasses the servers, networks, databases, and software that enable these collaborative knowledge platforms to operate and scale globally. Both belong to the Other category, making them direct alternatives.

Which is more popular, Typeform or Wikimedia EaSAMS Infrastructure?

Based on our analysis of real websites, Wikimedia EaSAMS Infrastructure is more widely adopted with 19 detections compared to Typeform's 11.

Can Typeform and Wikimedia EaSAMS Infrastructure be used together?

In our current dataset, no websites use both technologies simultaneously. This suggests they typically serve as alternatives rather than complementary tools.

Check Any Website's Technology Stack

Find out if a website uses Typeform, Wikimedia EaSAMS Infrastructure, or any other technology.

Analyze a Website

More Comparisons

Browse All Comparisons →