Technology Comparison

jQuery vs Screenfull.js

Side-by-side comparison based on real-world adoption data from 136,136 detections across analyzed websites.

Market Share Distribution

jQuery (100%)Screenfull.js (0%)
Total Detections
136,136
jQuery
HIGHER
0
Screenfull.js
Websites Using
142,234
jQuery
HIGHER
0
Screenfull.js
Used Together
0
websites use both

jQuery

Libraries

Fast, small JavaScript library simplifying DOM manipulation, event handling, and AJAX. Still used by 77% of the top 10M websites.

136,136 detections
142234 sites
Visit WebsiteView Profile

Screenfull.js

Libraries

Simple wrapper for cross-browser usage of the JavaScript Fullscreen API.

0 detections
0 sites
Visit WebsiteView Profile

Our Analysis

jQuery is significantly more popular than Screenfull.js in our dataset, appearing on 142234 websites compared to 0. Both are in the Libraries category, making them direct alternatives.

Sites Using Both (0)

No sites use both technologies together.

Only jQuery

0-2222bet.com007.com007james.com007store.com007time.ru009sg.com01.org01001.com.ua01bet.net01km.ru

Only Screenfull.js

No exclusive sites found.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between jQuery and Screenfull.js?

jQuery is significantly more popular than Screenfull.js in our dataset, appearing on 142234 websites compared to 0. Both are in the Libraries category, making them direct alternatives.

Which is more popular, jQuery or Screenfull.js?

jQuery is more widely adopted with 136136 detections compared to Screenfull.js's 0 detections in our dataset.

Can jQuery and Screenfull.js be used together?

In our current dataset, no websites use both jQuery and Screenfull.js together, suggesting they typically serve as alternatives.

Check Any Website's Technology Stack

Find out if a website uses jQuery, Screenfull.js, or any other technology.

Analyze a Website

More Comparisons

Browse All Comparisons →