Technology Comparison

Contact Form 7 vs Everest Forms

Side-by-side comparison based on real-world adoption data from 11,799 detections across analyzed websites.

Market Share Distribution

Contact Form 7 (99%)Everest Forms (1%)
Total Detections
11,718
Contact Form 7
HIGHER
81
Everest Forms
Websites Using
11,769
Contact Form 7
HIGHER
81
Everest Forms
Used Together
14
websites use both
0% OVERLAP

Contact Form 7

Plugins

Free WordPress contact form plugin supporting multiple forms, AJAX submission, CAPTCHA integration, and Akismet spam filtering.

11,718 detections
11769 sites

Everest Forms

Plugins
81 detections
81 sites

Our Analysis

Contact Form 7 is significantly more popular than Everest Forms in our dataset, appearing on 11769 websites compared to 81. 14 websites use both technologies together (0% overlap). Both are in the Plugins category, making them direct alternatives.

Contact Form 7 vs Everest Forms: In-Depth Analysis

Contact Form 7 and Everest Forms represent two vastly different scales of adoption within the WordPress plugin ecosystem, with the former maintaining a detection count of 553 compared to the latter's 5. For engineering leads, this 110:1 ratio in market presence highlights a significant disparity in community-vetted stability and third-party integration support. Contact Form 7 is established across a broad range of 553 sites, including high-traffic domains like 972mag.com and abet.org, positioning it as a standard utility for form management. Everest Forms, by contrast, appears on only 5 sites within the current dataset, suggesting a more niche or emerging presence. While both technologies are categorized as plugins, Contact Form 7 provides a documented feature set including AJAX submission and Akismet spam filtering, whereas Everest Forms operates with a smaller footprint on sites such as divisionmidway.org. This analysis evaluates whether the massive market share of Contact Form 7 outweighs the localized utility of Everest Forms for modern web deployments.

Key Differences

  • Market Penetration: Contact Form 7 has an extensive site count of 553, whereas Everest Forms is detected on only 5 sites.
  • Feature Transparency: Contact Form 7 explicitly supports AJAX submission, CAPTCHA integration, and Akismet spam filtering, while Everest Forms' specific feature set is not detailed in the provided metadata.
  • Deployment Profile: Contact Form 7 is utilized by international organizations like AANS and ABET, while Everest Forms is found on specialized domains such as themegrill.com and zakratheme.com.
  • Shared Usage: The technologies rarely coexist, with only 1 shared site (divisionmidway.org) identified in the market data, indicating they are primarily viewed as direct alternatives.

When to choose Contact Form 7

Contact Form 7 is the superior choice when project requirements demand a proven, high-volume solution with built-in support for AJAX and spam prevention via Akismet. With a detection count of 553, it is the industry standard for developers who prioritize a plugin with a massive install base and verified compatibility across diverse sites like 10eurobonus.casino and aclunc.org. Its integration with CAPTCHA makes it ideal for public-facing forms where security and submission reliability are non-negotiable for SEO and user experience.

When to choose Everest Forms

Everest Forms is a viable consideration for projects where the specific ecosystem of its host sites, such as themegrill.com or zakratheme.com, is already in use. Given its site count of 5, it may be preferred by developers seeking a lightweight alternative or those working within the specific design frameworks of its existing users. While it lacks the documented feature list of Contact Form 7, its presence on sites like divisionmidway.org suggests it fulfills basic plugin requirements for organizations that do not require the extensive third-party integrations associated with more widely adopted tools.

Market Insight

The market data reveals a highly concentrated landscape where Contact Form 7 dominates with 553 sites. There is minimal overlap between the two technologies, with only 1 shared site identified: divisionmidway.org. This single shared instance indicates that while both plugins can technically coexist on the same WordPress installation, they are typically treated as alternatives. The detection count ratio highlights a massive gap in market trust and developer preference, with Contact Form 7 appearing on 100% of the sites in this comparison's primary dataset.

The Verdict

Contact Form 7 remains the definitive choice for scale and reliability, backed by 553 detections and a robust feature set including AJAX and CAPTCHA. Everest Forms, with only 5 detections, serves a much smaller segment of the market. Decision-makers should prioritize Contact Form 7 for its proven track record on major sites like abnt.org.br, while reserving Everest Forms for niche implementations where its specific footprint on sites like drschwenke.de aligns with localized project needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Contact Form 7 support spam protection?

Yes, Contact Form 7 includes integrated support for Akismet spam filtering and CAPTCHA to secure form submissions.

How many sites currently use Everest Forms according to the data?

The dataset shows Everest Forms is active on 5 sites, including divisionmidway.org and perfectdailygrind.com.

Are Contact Form 7 and Everest Forms ever used together?

There is only 1 recorded instance of shared usage between Contact Form 7 and Everest Forms on the site divisionmidway.org.

Which high-profile sites utilize Contact Form 7?

Contact Form 7 is used by several notable organizations, including 972mag.com, aans.org, and abet.org.

What is the detection count for Contact Form 7 compared to Everest Forms?

Contact Form 7 has a detection count of 553, whereas Everest Forms has a detection count of 5.

Check Any Website's Technology Stack

Find out if a website uses Contact Form 7, Everest Forms, or any other technology.

Analyze a Website

More Comparisons

Contact Form 7 vs Everest Forms - Comparison & Market Share | StackOptic | StackOptic