AWS WAF vs Sqreen
Side-by-side comparison based on real-world adoption data from 2,365 detections across analyzed websites.
Market Share Distribution
AWS WAF
SecurityAWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect your web applications or APIs against common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources. It allows you to create custom rules to block specific attack patterns.
Sqreen
SecuritySqreen is the application security platform for the modern enterprise. Acquired by Datadog in Apr 2021.
Our Analysis
AWS WAF is significantly more popular than Sqreen in our dataset, appearing on 2365 websites compared to 0. Both are in the Security category, making them direct alternatives.
AWS WAF vs Sqreen: In-Depth Analysis
Evaluating AWS WAF and Sqreen reveals a stark contrast in market presence and operational focus within the security category. AWS WAF currently maintains a detection_count of 404 across StackOptic’s dataset, securing high-traffic domains like 500px.com and 2k.com. In comparison, Sqreen shows a detection_count of 0 and a site_count of 0, reflecting its status as an application security platform that was acquired by Datadog in April 2021. While AWS WAF is positioned as a web application firewall designed to protect APIs and web applications from exploits that consume resources or compromise availability, Sqreen is defined more broadly as a platform for the modern enterprise. The market data indicates a shared_count of 0 between these two technologies, suggesting that organizations in this dataset are currently opting for the rule-based customization of AWS WAF rather than the integrated platform approach of Sqreen.
Key Differences
- Market Adoption AWS WAF is actively detected on 404 sites, whereas Sqreen currently has a site_count of 0 in the provided dataset.
- Core Functionality AWS WAF functions specifically as a web application firewall with custom rules for attack patterns, while Sqreen is categorized as a broader application security platform.
- Corporate Status Sqreen was acquired by Datadog in April 2021, potentially impacting its standalone deployment compared to the independently managed AWS WAF.
- Target Use Cases AWS WAF focuses on application availability and resource consumption protection, while Sqreen targets the security needs of the modern enterprise.
- Deployment Footprint AWS WAF is utilized by major entities such as 0catch.com and a16zcrypto.com, while Sqreen lacks a visible footprint in the current market sample.
When to choose AWS WAF
AWS WAF is the superior choice when your organization requires a proven web application firewall with a verifiable track record across 404 sites. It is specifically built for teams needing to create custom rules to block attack patterns that threaten application availability or security. If your infrastructure supports high-profile domains like 2kgames.com or 3dhubs.com, AWS WAF provides the necessary tools to prevent resource exhaustion and compromise. Its ability to protect both web applications and APIs makes it a versatile component for standard cloud-based security architectures.
When to choose Sqreen
Sqreen should be considered by modern enterprises looking for an application security platform that integrates with the Datadog ecosystem, following its acquisition in April 2021. While it currently shows a site_count of 0 in this specific dataset, its positioning as a platform for the modern enterprise suggests it may be better suited for organizations seeking a unified security approach rather than a standalone firewall. It is the appropriate pick for teams transitioning their security operations into Datadog's monitoring and observability stack.
Market Insight
The market data shows a complete lack of overlap between these two security tools, with a shared_count of 0. AWS WAF dominates the pair with a detection_count of 404, while Sqreen has yet to register a presence in the sampled sites. This suggests that AWS WAF is a standard industry choice for active web protection, whereas Sqreen's zero detection count likely reflects its transition into the Datadog platform or a shift in how its enterprise security features are deployed.
Sites Using Both (0)
No sites use both technologies together.
Only AWS WAF
Only Sqreen
No exclusive sites found.
The Verdict
The choice between AWS WAF and Sqreen is a choice between an established, rule-based firewall and a platform-based security solution. AWS WAF provides immediate, visible utility for 404 sites by defending against common web exploits. Sqreen, post-acquisition by Datadog, offers an enterprise-grade security platform but lacks the independent market footprint seen in AWS WAF. For active protection of APIs and web applications, AWS WAF remains the more prevalent and documented solution in this comparison.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does AWS WAF or Sqreen have a higher site count?
AWS WAF has a significantly higher site count with 404 detections, while Sqreen currently has a site count of 0.
Can AWS WAF and Sqreen be used together?
While they both fall under the security category, the market data shows a shared_count of 0, meaning no sites in the dataset currently use both AWS WAF and Sqreen simultaneously.
What is the primary purpose of AWS WAF compared to Sqreen?
AWS WAF is a web application firewall used to block specific attack patterns via custom rules, whereas Sqreen is described as an application security platform for the modern enterprise.
Who owns Sqreen and how does it relate to AWS WAF?
Sqreen was acquired by Datadog in April 2021, whereas AWS WAF is a service provided by Amazon Web Services; both aim to secure web applications but through different delivery models.
Which top sites are currently using AWS WAF instead of Sqreen?
Sites such as abcmouse.com, 47news.jp, and 500px.com are currently using AWS WAF, while Sqreen has no top sites listed in the provided data.
Check Any Website's Technology Stack
Find out if a website uses AWS WAF, Sqreen, or any other technology.
Analyze a Website